How to Help Your Readers See Your World
By Marcy Kennedy (@MarcyKennedy)
I have a confession to make. It took me three tries to finish Tolkien’s The Fellowship of the Ring.
I stalled out the first two times in the same place—at the house of Tom Bombadil. I tried to slog through all the description, but my attention would slip, I’d set the book down, and something more interesting would steal its place. On the third try, I skipped that section and sailed through the rest of the series.
Most readers aren’t going to be so determined to read your book, and the biggest trap when it comes to over-describing is the sense of sight. And that’s logical. It’s the sense we use the most, and it’s the sense we need to include the most so the reader gets a solid grasp of our setting.
But how do we include enough sight details without creating the Tom Bombadil problem?
Allow Your Character to Put Their Own Twist on It
We hear this advice all the time. Everything needs to be said the way your point of view character would. What would your POV character notice? How would they describe it?
Take it bigger.
Is your character an optimist or do you want to show her in a good mood? Have her notice the one point of beauty in an otherwise ugly item.
Want to show the character arc? How does what they notice about a particular object change over the course of the story?
Use Carefully Chosen Items to Foreshadow
The problem with sight is every day we’re overwhelmed with thousands of meaningless, extra images. Consequently, when we write, we’re tempted to also fill our books with images that don’t serve a purpose. In fiction, everything needs to serve a purpose.
We can include sight details so people see the setting. We can include sight details to set the mood. We can also use sight details to foreshadow.
Foreshadowing is hinting at what’s to come in your story. You can foreshadow a major plot element, the character’s internal state or future transformation, or a secret (either not yet revealed or revealed to the reader but not to the POV character) all through little sight details.
Remember the key here is subtle. So subtle in fact that not every reader will catch it. But the ones who do will love you for it.
Put What Your Character Sees Into Motion
Unlike the other senses, sight often takes more than a single detail to give us a vivid picture, especially if the setting or character you’re describing is important. While adding action (or at least a feeling of motion) won’t fix a giant info dump, it can ensure longer descriptions still have forward momentum.
Suzanne Collins used this expertly when describing Rue, the youngest competitor in The Hunger Games.
She has bright, dark eyes and satiny brown skin and stands tilted up on her toes with arms slightly extended to her sides, as if ready to take wing at the slightest sound. It’s impossible not to think of a bird (pg. 98).
N.K. Jemisin did the same thing in her Hugo and Nebula-nominated novel The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms.
Face like the moon, pale and somehow wavering. I could get the gist of his features, but none of it stuck in my mind beyond an impression of astonishing beauty. His long, long hair wafted around him like black smoke, its tendrils curling and moving of their own volition. His cloak—or perhaps that was his hair too—shifted as if in an unfelt wind (pg. 30).
So How Can We Balance the Five Senses?
Here’s my tip for figuring out your weaknesses when it comes to the five senses in your fiction or memoir. Take your first chapter, last chapter, and five random chapters from the middle. (No cheating and picking your best.) Assign each sense a different color and circle or highlight every time you use a sense. Once you finish, spread the papers out around you. You’ll immediately be able to see which sense you use the most and where you’re weak.
How do you feel about sight descriptions in books? Do you like to be shown everything in detail or do you prefer the author leave much to your imagination?
I hope you’ve enjoyed this series on the five senses. If you missed the first four installments, you can check out my posts on taste, touch, smell, and sound here.
Interested in more ways to improve your writing? Grammar for Fiction Writers is now available from Amazon, Kobo, or Smashwords. (You might also be interested in checking out Showing and Telling in Fiction
or Dialogue: A Busy Writer’s Guide
.)
All three books are available in print and ebook forms.
I’d love to have you subscribe. I’ll be kicking off a series on dialogue soon.
Photo Credit: Raphael Pinto on www.sxc.hu
Aug 23, 2012 @ 12:44:55
Great post! I especially liked the first point. Some of the most powerful books I’ve read (I’m thinking of The Poisonwood Bible and A Series of Unfortunate Events) had such a strong voice I could tell whose POV it was without even reading the name. That’s strong writing, and really connects you to the character!
Aug 23, 2012 @ 15:33:39
Even though I’m not usually a fan of literary fiction, one of the reasons I loved The Help was because of the distinct voices each POV character had. It made such a difference.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 13:14:01
Marcy, fantastic tip on finding the balance of your 5 senses in your writing! I am writing my last scene today on a sequel and will be doing just his exercise. Enjoyed the samples, especially N.K. Jemisin. Very poetic and lyrical in its prose that captures all the senses.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 18:49:49
Thanks 🙂 When you read N.K. Jemisin’s books, it’s easy to see why her work has been nominated for so many awards.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 15:30:12
The over-description was the same reason I could never get through LotR. I can’t stand too much description. I don’t even necessarily like my characters to be described in much detail, as long as I get a “feel” about them (or unless it’s important to the plot).
I know I use sight too much in my writing (my characters are always looking at each other), but I’ve been trying to balance it out with the other senses in the re-write, and this series has definitely helped!
Aug 23, 2012 @ 15:32:36
I’m really glad to hear that. I’m sorry it took so long to finish. It seemed like so many other urgent posts needed to go up that even though I had these all written, they didn’t get a chance to go live 🙂
Aug 23, 2012 @ 15:54:00
Hi, Marcy. You wrote: “Want to show the character arc? How does what they notice about a particular object change over the course of the story?”
Thanks for that so-smart tip.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 18:47:12
I’m glad you enjoyed it!
Aug 23, 2012 @ 18:35:11
Great tips, Marcy. I like leaving some physical description up to the reader, so I avoid going into super deep details.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 18:46:49
This was an area where Lisa Hall-Wilson and I found an interesting different when we started writing together. I tend not to go into detail about what my characters look like because I prefer to imagine characters for myself, while Lisa kept wanting to know what they looked like. I find it so fascinating how we all have these small differences in reading preferences.
Aug 23, 2012 @ 22:28:09
I tend to forget to describe anything but the interaction going on in the scene. As I’m revising my WIP I realized I never actually tell you what the protagonist looks like. You get hints here and there, but nothing concrete. Not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing. None of the beta’s mentioned it. /shrug
It’s what I liked about Rowling’s Potter series…she does a masterful job of combining all five senses on nearly every page. You see it, smell it, taste it…it’s all there.
Aug 24, 2012 @ 00:27:15
Such an important question, Marcy. How much description is too much, or not enough. I’m with you and August, to a point. I try just to sketch a general sense of the person’s appearance so as not to conflict with the image the reader has in his/her own mind. But as a fairly visual person, I get annoyed when there is little or no physical description of a character or scene.
And a beta called me recently on not enough detail to support the action. Someone’s throat is cut while they are sitting on a sofa. I was imagining the sofa sitting out in the room so the assailant could approach from behind (but didn’t ‘set the stage’ sufficiently); she assumed it was against the wall and wondered why this guy would let someone brandishing a knife just walk up to him. Oops!
I just went back and looked through your posts on the other senses as well. What a great reminder of ways to engage them all to really enrich one’s writing! Thanks so much for this series.
Aug 24, 2012 @ 14:55:42
Great ideas, Marcy. One of my crit partners always tells me that description is my strong point, but sometimes I get too wordy or describe things that don’t matter to my character. I just think they’re cool, lol. So I have to be very careful with that.
I love the examples you used – they area always the best way to get my head wrapped around the idea.
Thanks!
Aug 24, 2012 @ 15:32:14
I’ve loved your posts on the senses. And I rushed out yesterday and purchased colored markers so I can attach my MG manuscript based on your suggestions.
Thanks, Marcy
Aug 25, 2012 @ 03:47:33
Having read both kinds of books…heavy or light on descriptions, I find I’d rather use my imagination for most stories. Just give me some basics…kind of long dark hair, green eyes, tall, muscular…and I’m good to go.
Maybe, because of that, I tend to go light on descriptions of everything, working them in a little at a time during actions, or dialog.
I have one book that’s been a favorite of mine since I was a teenager. It was really old then, and the copy I found was used. When it fell apart, I was afraid I’d never find another…but it’s available in print-on-demand. Yay! So I bought it.
That’s how much I love it. However, there are passages in that story seriously heavy with Eskimo folklore and, after the first time plodding through it, I’ve skipped those parts ever since.
I want to see what characters are doing, know what they’re thinking, and read what they’re saying. As for the rest, hints are fine.
Great info, Marcy! You help us to be so aware of what we’re writing. Thank you! 🙂
Aug 25, 2012 @ 16:01:57
This is a lovely post. When I was younger, I thought that (because of all the classics I read, and books like The Hobbit, as you mentioned) that being a great writer meant I had to write intensely long descriptions about everything.
One of my pieces from middle school had me waxing poetic about crown molding…yeah.
The point you had about the ‘classic’ authors having a vastly different audience and pay scale was a great one! I didn’t know a lot were paid by word.
And the tips you provide definitely help move a reader along when you do have to describe something without weighing them down.
Aug 28, 2012 @ 05:24:11
A lot of the Tolkien books took me a while to get into. That being said, I LOVED the stories. They’re all so layered and trancendent. (I hate to be cheesy, but I feel that way about your blog. 🙂 )
Happy writing this week!
Aug 28, 2012 @ 12:53:37
I hope you mean the layered and transcendent part rather than the “hard to get in to” part *wink* 🙂